The winners and losers of the proposed Stratasys-3D Systems merger being analyzed.

Share this story

A Game-Changing Move: Stratasys Contemplating 3D Systems’ Takeover Offer

It seems like the 3D printing industry is on the verge of witnessing a seismic shift. Stratasys, one of the leading players in the industry, has long been courted by several companies for a takeover. Most notably, Nano Dimension and 3D Systems have been knocking on Stratasys’ door with tempting offers. Until recently, Stratasys had firmly shut down all such proposals. However, things seem to have taken an intriguing turn.

Last week, Stratasys surprised everyone by not outright rejecting 3D Systems’ takeover bid. Instead, they left the doors open for further discussions. As we speak, those discussions are likely ongoing, and it won’t be long before we know the outcome. If Stratasys were to accept 3D Systems’ proposal, it would undoubtedly reshape the 3D printing landscape. But what would this mean for the industry and its stakeholders? Let’s delve into some potential scenarios.

Both 3D Systems and Stratasys have a rich history of acquiring companies in the 3D printing realm. Together, they have likely brought under their control over 100 separate 3D printing operations or related entities. A merger between them would consolidate the patent rights for countless 3D printing processes. This comprehensive portfolio would cover virtually every aspect of the industry, making the combined entity a powerhouse. Moreover, a larger 3D Systems would have greater resources and motivation to protect their patents, potentially leading to more aggressive legal action.

Beyond patents, both companies boast the largest sales and distribution networks for 3D printers worldwide. Merging the two giants would create an unrivaled sales network, enhancing the reach and accessibility of 3D printing technologies. Nevertheless, clashes with resellers may arise in certain regions, resulting in some losing their partnership with the merged company. On the other hand, the new 3D Systems might adopt a strategy of maximizing the number of sellers for their products, capitalizing on the synergies generated from the merger.

Speaking of synergy, it is an inevitable outcome of any merger. In this case, the consolidation of Stratasys and 3D Systems could lead to redundancies in administrative departments and other areas. While employees working on specific products would likely remain unaffected, there would undoubtedly be a substantial number of redundant positions. 3D Systems has already estimated savings of $100 million, a significant portion of which would come from eliminating excess staff through layoffs.

The fate of Stratasys’ executive management is another aspect to consider. If 3D Systems takes over, there may be little need for Stratasys executives. However, negotiations are currently underway, and the involvement of these executives could play a key role in tipping the scales towards an agreement. Their future is uncertain, but they hold the decision-making power at this crucial juncture.

Both companies invest heavily in research and development. A merger would likely increase the scale and scope of these activities, allowing for more comprehensive advancements in the field. While the combined entity would already possess an extensive patent portfolio, continuous development of new patents would remain imperative. With greater resources at their disposal, the new company could push the boundaries of innovation even further.

However, the consolidation of equipment and processes under the new 3D Systems umbrella could have unintended consequences. With reduced competition, there is a possibility that prices of equipment and materials may rise. For example, Stratasys’ RPS technology would no longer compete with 3D Systems’ SLA technology. This monopolistic situation can lead to increased prices or even the elimination of certain technology implementations. Unfortunately, this wouldn’t bode well for potential buyers of 3D printers.

Adding further complexity to the situation is the pending merger between Stratasys and Desktop Metal. Although this merger was in progress before 3D Systems’ offer, it still looms in the background. Should Stratasys decide to accept 3D Systems’ proposal, 3D Systems has stated that they will cover any penalties specified in the Desktop Metal agreement. The fate of this parallel merger remains uncertain but could have significant consequences for all parties involved.

In conclusion, Stratasys’ contemplation of 3D Systems’ takeover offer marks a potential turning point in the 3D printing industry. A merger between these two giants would create a behemoth with unmatched resources, patent portfolios, and sales networks. However, it also brings forth questions about pricing, redundancies, and the future direction of the industry. With negotiations underway, the industry eagerly awaits the outcome that will shape its landscape for years to come.

The metal industry would undoubtedly suffer as a result, but they would still receive a substantial sum from the penalty payment. This influx of cash could enable Desktop Metal to explore the opportunity of acquiring another company, further expanding their reach and influence in the market. Alternatively, the newly-formed 3D Systems could potentially reconsider their merger with Desktop Metal and initiate negotiations on different terms. This potential collaboration would result in a mammoth company that could potentially dominate the industry entirely.

Previously, Nano Dimension had repeatedly expressed interest in acquiring Stratasys, but their bids were consistently rejected. However, if the agreement between 3D Systems and Stratasys is accepted, Nano Dimension’s pursuit of Stratasys would come to an end indefinitely. Nevertheless, Nano Dimension would still have a valuable cash reserve of US$1 billion at their disposal, and it is highly likely that they would actively seek opportunities to invest and grow their business. Could they potentially consider acquiring Desktop Metal?

For other companies in the industry, these developments present two significant implications. Firstly, they would now face an incredibly formidable competitor with an abundance of resources that simply cannot be matched. Operating in this new landscape could prove to be much more challenging for them. Secondly, the larger 3D Systems would have the means and capabilities to acquire additional companies. It would not be surprising to see 3D Systems strategically acquiring a few carefully selected companies to further augment and complete their portfolio.

In conclusion, the potential outcomes of the hypothetical situation discussed above would undoubtedly alter the dynamics of the 3D printing industry. The dominance and influence of 3D Systems and Desktop Metal would be amplified, while other companies would face significant obstacles in competing against them. It remains to be seen how the industry will evolve, but one thing is certain: the future of 3D printing holds both lucrative opportunities and intense competition.

Original source


Share this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *