The Growing Concern Surrounding 3D Printed Firearms
With the increased prevalence of news stories involving 3D printed firearms, the global conversation surrounding this issue is becoming more urgent. Recent incidents in Bellevue, Washington, and Eugene, Oregon serve as striking examples of the complex intersection between technology, personal freedoms, and public safety concerns. These incidents have reignited the heated debate regarding the legal implications of 3D printed firearms.
Bellevue, Washington was rocked by a drive-by shooting, which led to the discovery of 3D printed ghost guns in the possession of the suspect. In Eugene, Oregon, police raided the home of a felon and uncovered narcotics, stolen property, and a 3D printed component for an AR15 rifle. These incidents highlight the alarming reality that criminals are utilizing 3D printing technology to obtain firearms illegally.
The legal aspect of this issue continues to be heavily disputed, as evidenced by a recent ruling by a US District Court in Texas. The court challenged the definitions set forth by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) when it comes to categorizing firearm components. This decision has been met with both applause and criticism, and there are plans for an appeal.
Meanwhile, in Finland, far-right extremist groups have also been suspected of using 3D printing to prepare for acts of terror. This adds another layer of concern to the already complex issue of 3D printed firearms.
One specific case that sheds light on the dangers of ghost guns involves Romeo Plummer, a 24-year-old man apprehended in Bellevue for a drive-by shooting. Plummer was found to possess four ghost guns, ammunition, and a 3D printer at his residence. Captain Shelby Shearer of the Bellevue Police Department emphasized the inherent risks of ghost guns, stating that they are unregulated and untraceable, posing a significant threat to law enforcement.
Jorge Martinez, the alleged target of the drive-by shooting, captured the incident on his cell phone. Martinez expressed his relief over Plummer’s arrest and stated that he filmed the incident to provide crucial information to his family in case anything happened to him. Erika Solis-Ibarra, the 21-year-old driver during the incident, was also arrested. Both Solis-Ibarra and Plummer now face charges related to the drive-by shooting.
In Eugene, Oregon, the Eugene Police Department conducted a well-planned operation targeting the residence of Stephen Allan Laszlo, a 41-year-old felon. Laszlo was suspected of possessing firearms, selling stolen property, and dealing drugs. During the search, Laszlo attempted to evade arrest by jumping from a second-story window, resulting in an ankle injury. The search of his apartment revealed illegal items including firearms, drugs, stolen goods, and a ghost AR15 rifle with a 3D printed lower receiver. Laszlo now faces multiple charges relating to controlled substance offenses and firearm possession as a felon.
The recent ruling by the US District Court for Northern Texas adds another layer of complexity to the 3D printed firearms debate. Judge Reed O’Connor addressed the controversy surrounding the ATF’s rule on the definition of firearm components under the Gun Control Act of 1968. The court ruled against the ATF’s updated definitions, declaring that a component cannot be classified as a “frame or receiver” unless it is fully functional as such. The ATF’s reliance on past practices was criticized, with Judge O’Connor asserting the necessity for reinterpreting clear statutory terms based on current conditions. However, the US Department of Justice intends to appeal this ruling, indicating that the legal battle surrounding 3D printed firearms is far from over.
The issue of 3D printed firearms presents a challenging paradox, as it highlights the intersection of technology, personal liberties, and public safety. While 3D printing technology offers numerous benefits and innovations, it also provides a new avenue for criminals to obtain firearms outside of existing regulations. Striking a balance between personal freedom and public safety remains an ongoing challenge for lawmakers and law enforcement agencies worldwide.
The battle against gun control is far from over. Despite efforts to regulate firearm ownership, the do-it-yourself (DIY) gun-making community has found ways to circumvent these restrictions. With the help of new technologies like 3D printing, individuals are able to create their own guns at home. This has posed a significant challenge for lawmakers and law enforcement agencies.
One recent case in Häme, Finland has highlighted the potential dangers of this growing trend. The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) and local police suspect that four members of a far-right extremist group in Lahti have committed an aggravated firearms offense with terrorist intent. This group, known for their strong anti-immigrant views, used 3D printing to create FGC-9 submachine guns.
What is particularly alarming is that this same weapon has been produced by anti-junta rebel groups in Myanmar. It appears that this group in Lahti shares similar beliefs and tactics, believing that violence is the way to bring an end to democracy quickly. Unfortunately, this way of thinking is not isolated to just this group, as it seems to be growing among some extreme right-wing factions.
During their investigation, the police discovered evidence suggesting that the group had planned and prepared for violent acts. Their targets were individuals based on their skin color, political affiliations, or other ideological perspectives. They even contemplated attacking critical infrastructure such as the power grid and railways.
This group’s communications revealed disturbing terms such as “siege,” “incitement,” and “race war,” all associated with accelerationist thinking. This ideology revolves around the idea of hastening societal collapse in order to rebuild from scratch. It is truly concerning to see such extremist beliefs gaining traction among individuals who have the means to create their own weaponry.
Authorities seized multiple 3D printed firearms during their investigation, along with related components and a significant amount of ammunition. They also discovered cannabis plants and a variety of other weapons. This case serves as a grim reminder of the dangers posed by these homemade firearms and the potential for individuals with extremist views to carry out acts of violence.
In a separate case, a far-right group based in Kankaanpää has also come under police scrutiny. This marks the first time that a far-right entity has been officially charged in Finland. While both groups appear to share accelerationist views, no direct connection between them has been confirmed at this time. However, it is clear that this extremist ideology is attracting individuals from various backgrounds.
The Lahti group members have been found to have links to other extremist organizations and events. Several of them have previous criminal records and ties to notorious far-right incidents, indicating a pattern of extremist behavior in their histories.
It is crucial that we stay informed about these developments and remain vigilant. The 3D printing industry, while holding great potential for innovation and progress, also poses significant challenges in terms of ensuring public safety. As this technology continues to advance, regulation and law enforcement efforts must keep pace in order to prevent the misuse of these powerful tools.
To stay up-to-date on all the latest news from the 3D printing industry and receive information and offers from third party vendors, make sure to subscribe to our newsletter. Together, we can work towards a safer and more responsible use of this transformative technology.
