Ceramic 3D printing allows for the real-time observation of meltpool behavior.

Share this story

A groundbreaking study delves into the intricacies of 3D printing ceramic materials using the LPBF process. LPBF, or Laser Powder Bed Fusion, is a widely adopted technique used by various industries to manufacture metal, polymer, and ceramic objects. Unlike other 3D printing methods that primarily produce prototypes, LPBF creates end-use parts that require the utmost quality. While surface quality is important, the internal strength of the printed material is even more critical since these parts are typically used in mechanical applications. This strength is determined by how the powder is fused together when exposed to the laser.

Over the years, researchers have discovered that the microstructure of LPBF-produced parts can vary significantly depending on various factors such as laser power, speed, chamber temperature, humidity, and oxygen levels. These numerous parameters present a challenging task for operators who must develop print plans that yield the desired part results. Consequently, LPBF is one of the costlier 3D printing processes available today.

The “meltpool” is a temporary area where the laser is actively operating on the powder bed surface. It is where the material softens and flows together, ultimately generating the microstructures of the finished part. Researchers have extensively studied the meltpool due to concerns about the quality of 3D printed ceramics using LPBF. They note that “mechanical properties of dense LPBF-manufactured ceramics are poor due to a large number of structural defects.” To investigate the root cause of these defects, they devised a method to observe the meltpool in action using “operando tomographic microscopy.”

If you’re unfamiliar with the term, tomographic microscopy provides a 3D perspective of the subject, unlike traditional X-ray views. Regular X-rays only capture objects that intersect with the plane of the beam, making it difficult to visualize meltpool movements or detect cracks from certain angles. Conversely, tomography captures views from multiple angles, creating a true 3D view of the subject. “Operando” simply means “working,” implying that tomography is performed while the subject (in this case, the meltpool) is active. By observing the meltpool activities in real-time and in three dimensions, researchers could conduct a series of experiments where print parameters were manipulated and flaws could be observed.

In their experiments, the researchers utilized a standard LPBF setup to print magnetite-modified alumina. So, what did they discover? According to the paper’s abstract, they found that “increasing laser power results in a significant increase in the melt pool width, but not its depth, and no melt pool depression is observed. Forces due to the recoil pressure do not significantly influence the melt pool dynamics. Increasing power allows for the avoidance of fusion porosity but enhances the formation of spherical porosity, which is created either by reaching the boiling point of liquid alumina or by introducing gas bubbles through the injection of hollow powder particles into the liquid.”

LPBF is an incredibly intricate process that occurs at the microscopic level. Conducting more investigations of this nature could greatly benefit those aiming to maximize the performance of their LPBF equipment.

Original source

Share this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *